I don't like 1.0 version!!!

Amon_Ra · #1 (**permalink**) 17th November 2003

It requires even more cpu power, computer works slower, I have problems with serbian titles, hate new logo, we didn't get anything new... disappointing!

I'll stick 0.86.501

John Banner · #2 (**permalink**) 17th November 2003

Perhaps you could have said that in a nice way? You probably forget that you're using it for free and that people are spending their free time on writing this player?

mesmo · #3 (**permalink**) 18th November 2003

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amon_Ra

It requires even more cpu power, computer works slower, I have problems with serbian titles, hate new logo, we didn't get anything new... disappointing!

I'll stick 0.86.501

Man :evil: who needs your 'feedback' ? (in this form)
remember the author is working hours and hours to serve us for free!
Im thankfull for his freetime and his programm witch is my number one player for years.

I personnaly dont like it the rc at first look, but ive have only tested it a few moments so i m not capable to judge it or to cry like a neerd in the forum.

0.86 is serving my needs and there are also rc-lovers, so stick with the version witch serve youre needs. Nobody needs to know how disappaointed u are are or what u hate.

my ?-cents

--

So many thanks!!! for developping bsplayer and dont let you disappoint
by teanager flames.

merci

phodown · #4 (**permalink**) 19th November 2003

Im thankfull for this great prog.
It's the ONE, the ultimate player.
Thanks to the author.

eli2k · #5 (**permalink**) 19th November 2003

BSPlayer is free and it's one of the best. You're not paying anything for it. And if you don't like the new version, just stick with the old one if it's doing everything you need. Plus, you can't expect them to create an amazingly better version without increasing required resources. E.g. compare the requirements of Win95 to WinXP. There's a big difference.

Hunter · #6 (**permalink**) 20th November 2003

Quote:

Originally Posted by eli2k

BSPlayer is free and it's one of the best. You're not paying anything for it. And if you don't like the new version, just stick with the old one if it's doing everything you need. Plus, you can't expect them to create an amazingly better version without increasing required resources. E.g. compare the requirements of Win95 to WinXP. There's a big difference.

What is "amazingly" better in version that use more CPU? I expected to get better (lower on CPU) player. Good example is 3ivx new codec ver 4.5 that is better CPU wise than before.

GOOD PLAYER=LESS CPU Time and overoll versality.

Tecno2k2 · #7 (**permalink**) 23rd November 2003

Guys...calm down
Remember that 1.0 is only a RC... far from being the final product

0.8x was also buggy when it was first released, give it some time to mature ;)

Hunter · #8 (**permalink**) 23rd November 2003

Although written from scratch it failed Version 1 is developed out of version 0.8 . to provide better CPU usage. Does project is taking wrong direction is early to say but complementary writing and gratitude for "free" player will not make a better player. Of course we know good work of BST and I hope he will understand this as constructive criticism.

krypton22 · #9 (**permalink**) 23rd November 2003

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hunter

Although written from scratch it failed Version 1 is developed out of version 0.8 . to provide better CPU usage. Does project is taking wrong direction is early to say but complementary writing and gratitude for "free" player will not make a better player. Of course we know good work of BST and I hope he will understand this as constructive criticism.

beg your pardon? where is this "constructive criticism" in this thread?

Amon_Ra · #10 (**permalink**) 23rd November 2003

May I have my opinion and to write it down :?: :!:

I know it's free, but I don't like it - that's all.

Hunter · #11 (**permalink**) 23rd November 2003

Constructive is to make a better CPU usage score. That is what count the rest are only good manners.

HackerWerger · #12 (**permalink**) 23rd November 2003

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amon_Ra

May I have my opinion and to write it down

I know it's free, but I don't like it - that's all.

Neither do I. The new version is buggy and consumes more CPU. :( However, (like I said in other forum) it is unfair and too early to condemn BST, as, in my thought, he will fix these problems in future versions. :D

ukd · #13 (**permalink**) 24th November 2003

Well, I have a low end PC and Bsp 1.0 works almost like 0.8x just a little more CPU consuming, not noticeable cuz it features a better A/V Sync; also have better picture quality and i get a better Framerate on my PC...

I Can't find any reason to dislike it... I absolutely love it... and i bet u have a better PC than mine... just play with player options and preferences...

c'ya...

tupac7 · #14 (**permalink**) 24th November 2003

HEY guys!!! Dont beef...

BSPlayer 1.00 is still not final. It is an RC, so have patience, till BST finishes the new version. (I thought he was dead, cool he is still alive 8) :roll: )